Avamprogetto (inglese)
Consultazione 2009/133: Rapport sur la conclusion d'un protocole modifiant la convention de double imposition entre la Confédération suisse et le Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d'Irlande du Nord en matière d'impôts sur le revenu. · 6 pagine
Fedlex · Progetto · Pagina 1Fedlex · Progetto
P R O T O C O L
BETWEEN THE SWISS CONFEDERATION AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AMENDING THE CONVENTION FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME, SIGNED AT LONDON ON 8 DECEMBER 1977, AS AMENDED BY THE PROTOCOLS SIGNED AT LONDON ON 5 MARCH 1981, AT BERNE ON 17 DECEMBER 1993 AND AT LONDON ON 26 JUNE 2007.
The Swiss Federal Council
and
the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
Desiring to conclude a Protocol to amend the Convention between the Swiss Confederation and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income, signed at London on 8 December 1977, as amended by the Protocols signed at London on 5 March 1981, at Berne on 17 December 1993 and at London on 26 June 2007 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),
Have agreed as follows:
ARTICLE I
Article 24 (Mutual Agreement Procedure) of the Convention shall be deleted and replaced by the following Article:
“Article 24
Mutual Agreement Procedure
1. Where a person considers that the actions of one or both of the Contracting States result or will result for him in taxation not in accordance with the provisions of this Convention, he may, irrespective of the remedies provided by the domestic law of those States, present his case to the competent authority of the Contracting State of which he is a resident or, if his case comes under paragraph 1 of Article 23, to that of the Contracting State of which he is a national. The case must be presented within three years from the first notification of the action resulting in taxation not in accordance with the provisions of the Convention.
2. The competent authority shall endeavour, if the objection appears to it to be justified and if it is not itself able to arrive at a satisfactory solution, to resolve the case by mutual